<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>minipix.co.uk &#187; VNC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/tag/vnc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk</link>
	<description>All the best things come in small packages.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The world of two buttons</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/10/the-world-of-two-buttons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/10/the-world-of-two-buttons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love VNC.  I&#8217;ve been using VNC for years.  Back when I was working at the University of Essex as the Chaplaincy Assistant I used VNC pretty much every day to use my computer.  These days I don&#8217;t use it quite so often, but it still has its uses.
For those not in-the-know, VNC is basically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/picture-2.png" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-559" title="picture-2" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/picture-2-300x240.png" alt="" width="300" height="240" /></a>I love VNC.  I&#8217;ve been using VNC for years.  Back when I was working at the University of Essex as the Chaplaincy Assistant I used VNC pretty much every day to use my computer.  These days I don&#8217;t use it quite so often, but it still has its uses.</p>
<p>For those not in-the-know, VNC is basically a screen sharing protocol.  When I was ChapAss I would load up my VNC program, tap in the IP address of my computer at home, and VNC would show me my own desktop and allow me to use the computer as if I was physically sat in front of it.  The benefit for me at that point was that I could use all the programs I was familiar with (which were far better than the ones the uni computers provided) and keep all my files in one place.  It worked really well, apart from when my computer crashed &#8211; then it meant phoning the house to see if anyone was in who could restart the computer.</p>
<p>Now, working from home, I have no need of VNC in quite the same way.  However, I do have two computers and only one monitor, so it still comes in handy sometimes.  My Mac is my main computer, on which I do pretty much everything.  But I also have a PC dual-booting XP and Ubuntu, mainly for testing purposes &#8211; it&#8217;s good to know that my web sites work on &#8216;normal&#8217; computers too.  And Linux.  So rather than connecting a keyboard, mouse and monitor to my PC, taking up valuable space on my desktop, I VNC into the machine when I want to use it, using both computers from one monitor and set of controls.</p>
<p>Of course, there is one small problem that needs to be overcome for this to work properly, and the root of that problem is that traditionally Mac mice have only one button.  With only one mouse button, how do you right click on an operating system that depends on it?</p>
<p><span id="more-556"></span><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-558" title="jollysfastvnc" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/jollysfastvnc.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="90" />So far I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://www.jinx.de/JollysFastVNC.html">JollysFastVNC</a>, which is a pretty good VNC client for the Mac.  Right-clicking on the Mac operating system is usually accomplished by holding down the CTRL key and clicking, and JollysFastVNC translates that to a right-click nicely.  So all is well.  Until, just recently, an update to JFV meant that I couldn&#8217;t hibernate Windows any more.</p>
<p>I use hibernation quite a lot on XP, and I have to admit I miss that on the Mac.  To hibernate, one holds down shift while pressing the Sleep button in the shutdown box.  That worked fine until recently, when the Shift key stopped being sent from JFV.  Not good.  Right-clicks still worked, but shift was just being ignored.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-557" title="2008-02-05-screen-sharing-icon" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2008-02-05-screen-sharing-icon.jpg" alt="" width="133" height="124" />Thankfully, Leopard actually provides its own VNC client in the form of its Screen Sharing accessory.  I say accessory because it&#8217;s not in the main Applications folder, but hidden away somewhere that&#8217;s not exactly easy to come by.  The idea is that you initiate Screen Sharing from the Finder, and Leopard goes off and finds the Screen Sharing app for you.  But of course that only works if the PC in question is showing up on the network.  Which mine isn&#8217;t.  Silly PC.  Thankfully I can enter the IP address of the computer and go in directly, though that does require me to remember the IP address.  And I can choose to keep the Screen Sharing app in the dock so I don&#8217;t have to go looking for it each time.</p>
<p>In actual fact the Screen Sharing app is pretty decent.  It&#8217;s faster than JFV, the mouse is more responsive, and the screen refreshes more intelligently.  All in all, a fantastic piece of kit, and one that is set to replace JollysFastVNC outright.  Except for one small niggle.  Screen Sharing doesn&#8217;t know what to do with right-clicks.  Holding down CTRL and clicking sends a CTRL-left-click to the other computer, which isn&#8217;t exactly what I want.  Solution?  Plug a two-button mouse into my Mac.</p>
<p>Now, to Mac purists, this is undoubtedly blasphemy.  Macs have always had single button mice.  It&#8217;s what&#8217;s always set them apart.  After all, why have two or three mouse buttons when you can do everything with one?  Still, Apple developers appreciated that not everyone was a purist, so has kindly provided support for pretty much any USB mouse, regardless of the number of buttons.  So, out came my PC&#8217;s mouse, with two buttons and a scroll wheel (that&#8217;s one thing I have missed).  Firing up Screen Sharing showed that the right click was being correctly sent via VNC as a right-click, as you&#8217;d expect.  And right-clicks in Leopard are interpretted as right-clicks, or what would have been produced by CTRL-clicking before.  My only problem now is getting used to having two buttons &#8211; I&#8217;m finding myself right-clicking by accident, because I&#8217;m so used to pressing the whole front of the mouse down.</p>
<p>So, it looks like I&#8217;m going to have to retrain my hand to use a two-button mouse again.  It still feels wrong, somehow, like trying to ride a motorcycle with 6 wheels.  I may have to look into getting a MightyMouse, maybe that will feel more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/10/the-world-of-two-buttons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A review of new (and old) technology</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G5 Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at Novatech, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at <a href="http://www.novatech.co.uk">Novatech</a>, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD processor, 32MB of RAM, a 5.6GB hard disk, and ran Windows 95.  Not exactly impressive, even then.  Still, it did me fine for a year, though it did spend most of its life sat on my desk and wasn&#8217;t really mobile much.  After that came a 1.2GHz tower, with 128MB RAM, 20GB hard disk, and Windows XP.  Even though it was still entry-level it was a significant step up for me, and allowed me to play games.  Not very good games, but they were games nonetheless.</p>
<p>However, it wasn&#8217;t long before I grew tired of the plastic look of XP, and started modding my desktop with <a href="http://www.wincustomize.com/">all manner of programs</a>, making it look very little like Microsoft designed it to be.  Eventually I found myself themeing everything I could lay my hands on to make it look more like a Mac, striving for that perfect interface.  It was no surprise then when a few years later I bought my first Mac, a second hand G3 Blue&amp;White.  Although originally it would have been only 450MHz the previous owner had stuffed a 1GHz G4 upgrade chip from <a href="http://www.sonnettech.com/">Sonnet</a> in there, which made a big difference.  In terms of numbers it should have been slower than the PC it replaced, but in fact it was still faster and smoother and certainly more satisfying to use.  Hooray for Apple!</p>
<p><span id="more-504"></span><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-505" style="float: left;" title="mac_mini" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_mini.jpg" alt="Mac Mini" width="200" height="133" />Of course, avid blog readers will know that my little G3 didn&#8217;t last forever, and eventually ceased to switch on, at which point I bought the cheapest Mac I could lay my hands on at short notice &#8211; a 1.42GHz Mac Mini.  In terms of raw processing power the Mini was a little faster than the G3, but I noticed that it was still struggling under the weight of everything I was asking it to do.  It got there in the end, but lack of memory really bogged it down.  Clearly, 512MB of RAM just isn&#8217;t enough to run the 101 programs I use on a daily basis.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-506" style="float: right;" title="mac_pro" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_pro.jpg" alt="Mac Pro" width="120" height="200" />So, after some saving up and some careful <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk/">eBaying</a>, I finally took delivery of a G5 2GHz Dual Processor PPC running Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.3), with a whopping 2.5GHz of RAM and two 180GB hard disks.  This is actually the first time I&#8217;ve owned a high-end computer, and it makes such a difference.  It may not be brand spanking new, and it may be running on a PPC chip rather than Intel, but it rocks nonetheless.  So I thought I&#8217;d share a few of the highlights with you, along with some short reviews of the software I&#8217;ve been using so far that I haven&#8217;t reviewed already.</p>
<h2>Mac OS X Leopard</h2>
<p>At first glance the OS looks more or less the same as Tiger.  Everything is in much the same place as before, it works in pretty much the same way, and visually it&#8217;s all still very much recognisable.  Unlike the whole XP/Vista thing.  But it would be a mistake to say that Apple haven&#8217;t done much to release Leopard.  It&#8217;s all those little things they&#8217;ve done which add up to something quite spectacular.  The interface is mor consistent, the way the Finder works is a little more polished, the Dock has a bit more sparkle and fun in it, and there are some extra built-in apps that make life just a little bit simpler than they were with Tiger.</p>
<p>I actually spent quite a lot of time on Tiger trying to emulate some of the new features Leopard brought in, such as the unified interface (courtesy of UNO), backups (with a little help from iBackup), even Stacks (by simply putting a folder onto the Dock).  I&#8217;m pleased to report that the Leopard versions are the original and best.  Time Machine really is a one-click setup; I plugged my firewire drive in, Time Machine recognised it and asked me if I would like to use it for backups, and that was it.  I did look for extra options, but there weren&#8217;t any.  It just works.</p>
<p>The Dock was something that caught my eye when Leopard was first demoed by Steve Jobs.  No longer just a flat semi-transparent panel (as cool as that was), the new Dock is more like a shelf, complete with reflections of both the icons and the windows on the screen.  Very cool.  Not exactly a boost to performance or efficiency, and no doubt the novelty will wear off after a while, but it&#8217;s one of those little extras that make the whole experience just that little bit more satisfying.  It&#8217;s like finding that the cup holders in your car also have a slot for holding a stirring spoon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite so entranced by Stacks, though, I have to admit.  Sure, they look pretty sweet and have cool animations, but are they really necessary?  To my mind they&#8217;re a fun feature, but one that I would prefer to be able to turn on and off.</p>
<p>Another useful feature found in Leopard is the screen sharing option.  With another computer on the network you can log in and share the screen of the other computer, which apparently happens courtesy of the VNC protocol.  I&#8217;ve been unable to get this working seamlessly so far, unfortunately; I&#8217;ve got my Mac Mini on the network still, but I can&#8217;t directly log into it, I have to &#8216;ask permission&#8217; and wait for it to be confirmed on the other computer.  That&#8217;s fine if your other computer has a screen, but my Mini doesn&#8217;t at the moment, so I have to either unplug the keyboard and monitor from the G5 and plug into the Mini just to confirm it and then plug it all back again, or use another VNC client to log in a different way.  I&#8217;m sure there must be a solution there somewhere, I just haven&#8217;t got to the bottom of it.  Incidentally, screen sharing with a PC works just fine.</p>
<p>Other built-in apps have also been given subtle make-overs, including Mail, iChat, Address Book and iCal.  Oh and the computer came preinstalled with iLife &#8216;08 too, plus a few other useful packages that nicely upgrade what I had before.</p>
<h2>The G5</h2>
<p>Right, I ought to say a quick something about the computer itself.  To start off with, it&#8217;s heavy.  Not just compared to the Mini, but compared to any other computer I&#8217;ve known.  That&#8217;s largely thanks to its metal case, but it also stands considerably taller than my old G3 Blue&amp;White (which I still have, gathering dust).  Still, what makes it stand out even more than that is the sheer quality of it.  I took the side off and found myself looking at the most tidy and well thought out inside of a computer I have ever seen.  Beautiful.  Gorgeous.  Stunning.  While most PCs look like the inside of a Radio Shack back room, the G5 looks like an executive jet.  There are no random wires connecting odds and ends together, no unnecessary big empty spaces, no mess of IDE cables.  Just pure, simple elegance of design.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I had a reason for looking inside the case, beyond the basic intrigue.  The CD drive wouldn&#8217;t open; it just clunked and did nothing.  Further inspection showed that the drive must have shifted in transit and was sitting a little too high so that the tray was hitting the casing and not coming through the gap.  Corrective surgery was needed, but thanks to the G5&#8217;s marvellous interior designers this proved to be easy as pie.  No screwdriver was necessary, just flick a couple of latches and the whole CD unit unlocked itself and became free.  I was then able to reposition it, relatch it, and it all worked fine.  Nice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also got an Airport wireless card, Bluetooth, and a selection of USB and Firewire ports.  Which are all very useful too.</p>
<h2>Firefox 3</h2>
<p>I know this isn&#8217;t quite on topic, but I thought it was worth a mention anyway.  While installing all my usual programs onto my fresh Leopard I found that <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/">Firefox</a> was offering its <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-rc.html">release candidate of version 3</a>.  I had previously been a great advocate of <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/">Camino</a>, what many would call the Mac version of Firefox, and had an alpha release of Firefox 3 for testing purposes.  There were problems with it though, and I stayed with Camino for the sake of stability and consistency.  However, now that FF RC3 is out, Camino hasn&#8217;t been used here much at all.</p>
<p>FF3 is a marked improvement over FF2 on the Mac.  Although FF2 remains arguably the best browser for the PC, on the Mac it was awful.  It was slow, it forgot where it put its memory (ah, the irony), and looked hideous.  FF3 promised a lot, and seems to have delivered on most of its early promises, giving Mac users a browser that looks good, feels responsive, and gives Safari some serious competition on the performance front.  And on top of all that you get that huge repository of addons just in case the basic functionality isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>So FF3 is set to become my primary browser for the time being, even though it is still on a Release Candidate (which basically means it&#8217;s not completely finished yet, but they&#8217;re happy for people to test it for them).</p>
<h2>The end</h2>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s it for now.  Of all of that, only FF3 is actually new news, the rest has been common knowledge for a while now, it just hasn&#8217;t been on my desk until now.  Still, it&#8217;s so nice to finally have a computer that is more than capable of running everything I throw at it.  I&#8217;ve got iStat meters in my menu bar showing what my two processors are up to, and so far they have yet to break a sweat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
