<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>minipix.co.uk &#187; RAM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/tag/ram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk</link>
	<description>All the best things come in small packages.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Considering a move to the fast lane</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve finally got to the point where I&#8217;m considering upgrading my computer again.  Some of you may remember that it&#8217;s actually not that long ago that I bought my current computer, a second-hand Mac Mini, to replace the previous G3 tower that died.  In all honesty the Mac Mini was only intended to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve finally got to the point where I&#8217;m considering upgrading my computer again.  Some of you may remember that it&#8217;s actually not that long ago that <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/2007/11/80000-miles-and-a-new-computer/">I bought my current computer</a>, a second-hand Mac Mini, to replace the previous <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/2007/11/time-for-a-much-needed-upgrade/">G3 tower that died</a>.  In all honesty the Mac Mini was only intended to be a short-term solution, as I need to replace the G3 but didn&#8217;t really have a budget for it at the time, hence the need for a cheap stop-gap solution.</p>
<p>To be fair, the Mac Mini has been superb.  It looks great, does the job very nicely, is blissfully quiet, and has a faster processor than the G3.  And for a £260 Mac, it really was a bargain.  Unfortunately, however, its power just doesn&#8217;t match up to my needs, and I&#8217;ve reached the point where I have to seriously consider budgeting for a more powerful alternative.</p>
<p><span id="more-484"></span>In truth, I am not the sort of user Apple targeted the Mac Mini at.  I use my computer for significantly more than surfing the web and checking e-mails.  On an average working day I will normally end up with at least a dozen programs all open at once, some of them big hefty ones like Photoshop; and my nice big 19&#8243; monitor still isn&#8217;t big enough, and I make regular use of virtual desktops, switching between various screens for different types of work.  All this is sometimes reasonably processor-intensive, and definitely requires plenty of RAM.  And it&#8217;s on this count that my Mac Mini falls down.</p>
<p>The 1.42Ghz G4 processor isn&#8217;t exactly sluggish, and handles everything I throw at it.  It&#8217;s the memory that lets it down.  The 512MB of RAM is quickly used up, and beyond that it seems to spend all its time swapping memory in and out from the hard disk, which slows everything down considerably and doesn&#8217;t do the hard disk much good either.  I did consider upgrading the memory in the Mac Mini, but it only has one slot and has an upper limit of 1GB, which I don&#8217;t think will be enough for very long.</p>
<p>So, the upshot of all this is that I&#8217;m looking at buying a new computer.  By &#8216;new&#8217;, incidentally, I mean second-hand, but not old.  After reading an <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/133150/2008/05/macbuying.html">interesting article on buying a Mac</a> the other day I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll need a nuclear-powered fire-breathing <a href="http://www.apple.com/macpro/">Mac Pro</a>, that&#8217;s perhaps a little too much power and far too many pennies.  And a laptop just isn&#8217;t enough of a step up from my Mac Mini to be worth the expense, along with the fact that I would never need it to move from the desk.  It seems the <a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/">iMac</a> is therefore the best option for me at the moment, with its reasonable price and mid-range performance.  It also has a built-in screen, which means I can use my existing TFT monitor as an additional screen for some double-headed fun.  I&#8217;ve found some machines on eBay with 4GB RAM and 2GHz processors, and that should certainly do me for a while.</p>
<p>The only problem with this approach is that it&#8217;s harder to replace bits when they go wrong.  Then again, when do Macs go wrong?  My old G3 only died because it was old, and by old I mean <em>really</em> old, and by <em>really old</em> I mean it originally had a 450MHz processor.  Ouch.</p>
<p>So, a new iMac is on the cards for the near future.  The biggest complication in all of this is that we&#8217;re also trying to save every penny at the moment for a deposit for a house, so that needs to be factored in as well.  Before I buy myself a shiny new computer, I shall need to make sure I can guarantee I can sell my Mac Mini to a good home and get some return on it.  Anyone interested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time to remember more?</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/03/time-to-remember-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/03/time-to-remember-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avid readers of this blog (oh, and friends too probably) will know that I fairly recently bought myself a Mac Mini, to replace my G3 Mac.  It was all somewhat of a last-minute transfer, with the G3 dying almost without warning and leaving me having to go back to using my PC with Windows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avid readers of this blog (oh, and friends too probably) will know that I fairly recently <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=396">bought myself a Mac Mini</a>, to replace my G3 Mac.  It was all somewhat of a last-minute transfer, with the G3 dying almost without warning and leaving me having to go back to using my PC with Windows XP &#8211; not an experience I want to repeat if I can help it.  The cause of death turned out to be the processor, which was an upgrade by the previous owner, and which stopped the computer booting up at all.  So I ended up buying myself a second-hand Mac Mini on <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk">eBay</a>, which was about all I could afford at short notice.</p>
<p>Despite being newer and having a faster processor (1.42Ghz rather than 1Ghz) I have to confess the speed increase wasn&#8217;t particularly noticeable.  In some ways it was much better &#8211; its graphics capabilities were much higher, allowing it to do the funky Quartz stuff &#8211; but it still struggled on occasions, especially when running several large programs at the same time.  That, sadly, is just the way my work goes though &#8211; it&#8217;s a rarity if I have less than 10 apps running at once, and that could well include <a href="http://caminobrowser.org">several</a> <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/safari.html">browsers</a>, Photoshop, <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/thunderbird/all.html">e-mails</a>, <a href="http://www.newsfirerss.com/">RSS client</a>, <a href="http://cyberduck.ch/">FTP client</a>, calendar, address book, <a href="http://www.neooffice.org/">word processor</a>&#8230; when I&#8217;m in full flow it gets rather crowded!  In fact, that&#8217;s on reason I&#8217;m using a virtual desktops setup, giving me the ability to put different programs on different virtual screens, keeping things a little more organised.</p>
<p><span id="more-430"></span>I discovered today (or rather, confirmed) that the likely cause of the sluggishness is the lack of memory.  The old G3 had a nice 800Mb of RAM, which was enough for the design work I was doing (it was the processor power that held that computer back most of all).  My PPC Mac Mini only has 512Mb, which apparently isn&#8217;t enough for what I want to be doing.  I checked out the memory usage with <a href="http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/vm_stat.1.html">vm_stat</a> today, and discovered that a fair amount of effort is going into performing page ins and page outs, where the physical memory is so overloaded that the OS has to swap stuff in and out of hard disk space to keep going.  Not only is this an extra strain on the processor and hard disk, but it takes time &#8211; hard disks are much slower than RAM.</p>
<p>Upgrading a Mac Mini isn&#8217;t going to be easy, but it is possible.  The most I can put in is 1Gb apparently, and the hardest part is getting the case off.  I&#8217;ve found a few tutorials on how to do this, and a new <a href="http://www.play.com/PC/PCs/4-/931230/Computer-Memory-1GB-PC2700-DDR-333Mhz-184pin-DIMM/Product.html">1Gb RAM chip</a> (it can only hold one at a time, unfortunately) will set me back about £30.  So that may be another expense to put through the business accounts soon.  I&#8217;ll let you all know how it goes.  Assuming the computer survives the ordeal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/03/time-to-remember-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
