<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>minipix.co.uk &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/tag/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk</link>
	<description>All the best things come in small packages.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is it Chrome? Is it Safari? No, it&#8217;s Firefox.</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2010/05/is-it-chrome-is-it-safari-no-its-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2010/05/is-it-chrome-is-it-safari-no-its-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 14:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/?p=918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all honesty I fell in love with Macs back before they were popular, back in the days of System 7.  My Dad used Macs every day, when he worked as a graphic designer for a local newspaper, and even then I could tell that the user interface was just so much &#8216;better&#8217; than Microsoft&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-1.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-919" title="Firefox looking like Chrome" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-1-300x219.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="219" /></a>In all honesty I fell in love with Macs back before they were popular, back in the days of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_7" target="_blank">System 7</a>.  My Dad used Macs every day, when he worked as a graphic designer for a local newspaper, and even then I could tell that the user interface was just so much &#8216;better&#8217; than Microsoft&#8217;s offering, which back then was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1" target="_blank">Windows 3.1</a>.</p>
<p>Times have changed since then, of course.  Now I&#8217;m running Mac OS X Leopard on a dual-processor G5 tower.  Not new by any means, but it still beats the pants off Vista on my laptop.  Of course, Google has had its part to play in driving things forward, revolutionising web searches and pretty much anything we do online.  They&#8217;ve even brought out their own web browser, but sadly they didn&#8217;t think it worth while to port a PPC version of it, so I can&#8217;t use that.</p>
<p>However, I can trick out my Firefox to do some of the same things that make Chrome such a fantastic browser.</p>
<p><span id="more-918"></span>There are several key areas where I think <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Chrome</a> has got it spot on.  Firstly, it&#8217;s simple.  Really simple.  In the same way that Google revolutionised web searching by stripping away everything but the search box itself, Chrome gives you only the controls you actually need.  The result is a user interface that is streamlined, uncomplicated and easy enough that a chimp with one eye could work it without hesitation.</p>
<p>Tabs are also rather cool in Chrome.  Putting them at the top actually does make a bit of sense, because it associates the location bar with the tab more logically.  It&#8217;s perhaps swings and roundabouts with the rest of the controls, admittedly, but I personally like the look of it, and find it easy to use.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s that insanely wide location bar.  Why is it so wide?  Oh yeah, there&#8217;s no search box.  Firefox thought they were so clever when they put a search box next to the location bar.  The rest of the competition quickly followed, keen to take advantage of people&#8217;s newfound love of searching for stuff.  But Chrome took it away again.  You might think that was a step backwards &#8211; after all, every browser before Firefox, including IE6, had one big location bar too &#8211; but Google built in a powerful search tool there too, so that the same box does two things.  Again, a nice bit of streamlining there.</p>
<p>Speed is another great arrow in Chrome&#8217;s quiver.  So great, in fact, that it&#8217;s left all the other browsers quaking in their boots and wondering what they&#8217;ll have to do to keep up.  Part of it, I&#8217;m sure, is a psychological thing: it looks simpler, so it must be faster.</p>
<p>And all of that is all very well, but I don&#8217;t actually have Chrome.  Because it won&#8217;t run on my Mac.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean that I can&#8217;t enjoy some of the benefits that Chrome introduced.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-1.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-919" title="Firefox looking like Chrome" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a> <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-2.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-920" title="Firefox search from location bar" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a> <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-5.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-922" title="Firefox with greyed URLs" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Picture-5-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>What you see in the screenshots above is not Chrome, nor is it Safari.  It&#8217;s Firefox 3.6.3 for Mac.  With bells on.  Courtesy of a few clever addons, this is how I&#8217;ve got it set up:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Tabs on top</strong>, courtesy of the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/12612/" target="_blank">GrApple Crisp</a> theme.</li>
<li><strong>Mac OS buttons and controls</strong>, also courtesy of GrApple Crisp.</li>
<li><strong>Combined location and search bar</strong>.  I removed the search bit from the toolbar so that the location bar extends to the whole width, and the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7931/" target="_blank">CyberSearch</a> addon allows me to search right from there.  Almost as clever as Chrome&#8217;s.</li>
<li><strong>Formatted URLs</strong>, thanks to the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4014/" target="_blank">Locationbar<sup>2</sup></a> addon, which greys out the bits of the URL that are not the domain, and basically makes it clearer where you are.</li>
<li><strong>Combined stop/refresh button</strong>, made possible by the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7401/" target="_blank">Smart Stop/Reload</a> addon.  More functionality with fewer buttons makes me happy.</li>
<li><strong>Tab close buttons on the right</strong>, and a whole load of other little tweaks provided by <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1122/">Tab Mix Plus</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s what makes my Firefox look the way it does.  I&#8217;m loving having my tabs up top, I love the clean, streamlined layout, I love that I can search from my location bar, and I love that I still have all the power of Firefox under the hood when I&#8217;m busy working.  Okay, so Firefox isn&#8217;t as fast as Chrome, but no addon is going to solve that one.</p>
<p>Of course, I do have a few other addons installed, either to make my life more bearable or to help me out as a web designer and developer.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/60/" target="_blank">Web Developer</a>.  This gives me an indispensable array of tools for inspecting web pages, tweaking features and bug-testing my web sites.  Couldn&#8217;t live without this.  Although at the moment I&#8217;ve not got it displayed as a toolbar, because I like the clean interface I&#8217;ve got at the moment, but thankfully it&#8217;s still accessible from the menu.</li>
<li>SEO for Firefox.  I don&#8217;t use this often, but it&#8217;s a nice tool to have every now and then to check how web sites are performing on Google.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1146" target="_blank">Screengrab</a>.  This little baby takes a screenshot of a web page.  It can grab a selection, everything you can currently see, the whole web page (including below the fold), or even the entire window.  And it&#8217;ll either save the result as a file or copy it to the clipboard.  I use this quite a lot.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8879" target="_blank">FoxTab</a>.  That&#8217;s the little icon on the far right of the tab bar.  Clicking on that gives me an uber-pretty wall of thumbnails of all my open tabs.  Which is very nice.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5791" target="_blank">Flagfox</a>.  This neat little plugin puts a flag in the location bar to tell me where the server of the web site I&#8217;m looking at is physically located.  It also gives me more information if I click on it.  Nice.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/402" target="_blank">Fangs</a>.  If you&#8217;re blind or partially-sighted, you&#8217;ll know all about JAWS, the industry leader in screen reading technology.  The Fangs addon shows me what JAWS would make of a web site, by rendering textually what a traditional screen reader would read out.  Useful for making sure my sites are accessible.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1433" target="_blank">Extended Statusbar</a>.  Gives me some useful information in the status bar about how long each page is taking to download, how big it is, and suchlike.  A bit like Opera.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/26" target="_blank">Download Statusbar</a>.  Puts the page load progress bar at the bottom of the window, so it&#8217;s out of the way.  A bit like Opera.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6622" target="_blank">DOM Inspector</a>.  The DOM is the Document Object Model, and is basically the structure behind a web page.  This is a useful addon that helps me debug web pages by seeing how each element relates to everything else and what properties it has.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3366" target="_blank">British English Dictionary</a>.  Because there are times when even I make spelling mistakes.</li>
<li><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865" target="_blank">Adblock Plus</a>.  Because no one likes adverts.</li>
</ul>
<p>So that&#8217;s my Firefox.  It&#8217;s not as fast as Chrome.  It&#8217;s not even as fast as Safari.  But it looks rather dashing, it&#8217;s fun yet professional, and gives me everything I need to do my job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2010/05/is-it-chrome-is-it-safari-no-its-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Mac Mini Media Centre</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/12/my-mac-mini-media-centre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/12/my-mac-mini-media-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPlayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s-video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About a year ago I bought myself a cute little Mac mini to replace my Blue&#38;White G3 that had died.  Around six months later I ditched the Mac Mini in favour of a more powerful and capable G5 tower which now acts as my primary computer.  Since then I&#8217;ve been at a loss to know [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-505" title="mac_mini" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_mini.jpg" alt="mac_mini" width="200" height="133" />About a year ago I <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk//2007/11/80000-miles-and-a-new-computer/">bought myself a cute little Mac mini</a> to replace my Blue&amp;White G3 that had died.  Around six months later I ditched the Mac Mini in favour of a <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/back-to-a-tower/">more powerful and capable G5 tower</a> which now acts as my primary computer.  Since then I&#8217;ve been at a loss to know what to do with my Mac Mini; I tried selling it to people I know, but no one was interested &#8211; I had bought it second hand and it just wasn&#8217;t new enough or powerful enough to be of interest to anyone.  So it sat in a bag on the floor in the study, feeling sorry for itself.  Until yesterday.</p>
<p>Having bought my wife a new mobile phone I found myself thinking about technical things (to try to quash the feelings of jealousy at her having a nicer phone than me), and after much research I found I could actually make use of the Mac Mini for very little additional cost.  We don&#8217;t watch much TV, so it wouldn&#8217;t actually be of any benefit to us for me to install a funky internet TV system, but watching <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer">iPlayer</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a> on the telly sounded like a cool idea &#8211; much more comfortable than several people trying to cram into the study to watch stuff on my computer.</p>
<p>This, then, is not a detailed tutorial on how to create a media centre, but rather an explanation of what I have done to create my particular system.  It might not be what you need, and I don&#8217;t pretend to have all the answers to every question you could possibly have on media centres.  But I will be including screenshots to explain stuff, and hopefully someone will find at least some of this useful, or vaguely interesting.</p>
<h2><span id="more-610"></span>The operating system and other software</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-1.png" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-611" title="Mac OS X Tiger" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-1-150x150.png" alt="Mac OS X Tiger" width="150" height="150" /></a>I have Mac OS X Tiger installed on the little box, which actually gives me all the basics I need.  In addition to the basic install I have iLife (for sharing my iTunes and iPhoto libraries on my primary computer) and <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/">Firefox 3</a>.  Yes, I could have used Safari, but Firefox comes with some cool plugins that will come in useful, and I&#8217;ll come onto that a bit later.</p>
<h2>The internal hardware</h2>
<p>The Mac Mini is running on a 1.42Ghz G4 PPC chip with only 512MB RAM, which is pretty pathetic by modern standards, and it really struggled when I was using it as my primary machine for work &#8211; browsing the web is no problem, but running a dozen large programs all at once really was asking too much from that amount of memory.  However, in this particular situation it should be plenty, and the onboard graphics chip handles video well enough.  And since I&#8217;m not going to be downloading massive media like films to play on it I don&#8217;t need much in the way of hard disk space either.  iPlayer and YouTube both stream their data so I&#8217;ve not had to clear out any space on the hard disk yet.  And if I do find myself needing more space later I can always delete some unwanted programs that I don&#8217;t use any more (Adobe Creative Suite isn&#8217;t really needed on a media centre).</p>
<h2>Control freak</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2.png" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-612" title="Keyboard Viewer" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-2-300x236.png" alt="Keyboard Viewer" width="300" height="236" /></a>So, how do you control a computer from a sofa?  The immediate answer is an Apple Remote, but I don&#8217;t have one.  Neither do I have a spare keyboard to plug into it.  However, I did happen to have a wireless mouse knocking around.  Of course, there is only so much you can do with just a mouse &#8211; a keyboard is a necessity for typing stuff.  At least, that was until I discovered that Mac OS X actually comes with a virtual keyboard, which they cunningly call Keyboard Viewer.  Now I can bring up an on-screen keyboard and type with the mouse!</p>
<p>If you want to find it, you&#8217;ll need to go into System Preferences &gt; International &gt; Input Menu, and select the Keyboard Viewer from the list, and make sure you tick  &#8220;Show input menu in menu bar&#8221; at the bottom of the window.  You&#8217;ll get a little icon in your menu bar showing your country&#8217;s flag, and in that menu you&#8217;ll be able to bring up the Keyboard Viewer.  By default I think it comes up in the small mode; if that&#8217;s too small for you to see from the other side of the room you can click the little green expand button in the top left corner and it&#8217;ll expand to a bigger size.</p>
<h2>DVI to S-video</h2>
<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-613 alignleft" title="dvi-video" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/dvi-video-150x150.jpg" alt="dvi-video" width="150" height="150" />A TV is not a monitor.  They speak very different languages, and display images in different ways (at least if you have a traditional CRT TV, if you have a flat screen TV it might be different).  However, a search around the net showed that all I needed was a DVI to S-video converter, provided by Apple, and I&#8217;d be in business.  I found one at a good price on eBay, and it arrived in the post yesterday.  So that plugs into the DVI connector on the back of the Mac Mini (Macs use DVI instead of VGA, don&#8217;t ask me why, but they effectively do pretty much the same thing), and the other end of the adapter provides a phono socket.  <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-614" title="Scart adapter" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/ss08203-5822tps306983-150x150.jpg" alt="Scart adapter" width="150" height="150" />Yes, all you need is a standard phono cable like you&#8217;d use for your speakers and you can connect the adapter to a scart adapter.  Lots of adapters, yes, but it works.  OS X recognises what sort of display you&#8217;re using and adjusts its settings automatically when it boots up, so that makes it nice and straightforward.</p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s a lot of adapters, but it basically follows this sequence of connections:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Mac Mini DVI port &gt; DVI to S-video adapter &gt; phono cable &gt; scart adapter &gt; scart splitter &gt; scart socket on TV</p>
<p>You might not need the scart splitter, but we&#8217;ve got too many devices and not enough built-in scart sockets.</p>
<h2>Sounding good</h2>
<p>The scart adapter I bought (from Tesco) actually has four sockets &#8211; video, s-video, left audio and right audio &#8211; but at the moment I&#8217;m only using one of them.  I&#8217;m sending the video to the TV but sending the audio straight to my sound system courtesy of a 2.5mm jack to twin phono cable, plugged into the headphones socket on the Mac Mini.  Sounds fantastic.  As long as the sound system speakers are turned on.</p>
<h2>Getting online</h2>
<p>My broadband router is upstairs in my study, where my old PC is connected to it via a traditional CAT5 cable, while my G5 and my wife&#8217;s laptop both connect wirelessly.  I do have another wireless dongle, a US Robotics USR805422 54Mbps USB adapter, which I used to use on the PC back when it was my primary computer.  Unfortunately no one has seen fit to make a Mac-compatible driver for it, so that presented a bit of a hurdle for my Mac Mini.  I didn&#8217;t really want to fork out for a new wireless dongle unless I really needed to.  <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-615" title="Asus WL-167g" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/717vb-150x150.png" alt="Asus WL-167g" width="150" height="150" />And that was when my next brainwave hit &#8211; I could use my wife&#8217;s wireless dongle instead (she was out at the time so couldn&#8217;t argue).  Some Googling revealed that there was indeed a Mac driver for the Asus WL-167g.  I found a link on someone&#8217;s blog to the right software, downloaded it and installed it on the Mac Mini, and after a little tinkering around I got it working &#8211; hoorah!!  Unfortunately rebooting the computer meant that the software revealed its flaw &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t remembering connection profiles so you had to enter the network password every time you logged in, which wasn&#8217;t quite what I wanted.  Eventually I found a link to the <a href="http://support.asus.com/download/download.aspx?SLanguage=en-us&amp;model=WL-167g">official driver on the Asus web site</a>, which appeared to be exactly the same software, but I installed it anyway and that seemed to solve the problem.  The Mac Mini now boots up, automatically logs in and connects to the internet.  Nice one.</p>
<h2>A few little touches to make things easier</h2>
<p>Of course, controlling a computer from the other side of a room has its difficulties &#8211; reading what&#8217;s on the screen is a bit of a nightmare.  I&#8217;ve set the resolution to 1024&#215;768 for now to allow enough room for everything to fit on the screen, but it does tend to make the writing rather tiny.  I know my way around the OS well enough that I can get around without needing to be able to read everything, but there are a couple of things I&#8217;ve done to make it a bit easier for other people.</p>
<p>The dock is on the left hand side of the screen to allow for the keyboard viewer which sits at the bottom of the screen, and is set to be pretty big so you can see the icons nice and clearly.  Magnification is on too, so the icons get even bigger when you need them to be.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also set the mouse cursor to be bigger too, courtesy of the Universal Access options.  Not too big, just a little bit larger so it&#8217;s easier to find.  Unfortunately the Universal Access options don&#8217;t appear to provide a way to make all the text bigger in the OS, like you get in Windows, but you can zoom in by pressing Control and using the mouse&#8217;s scroll wheel.  And yes, that does work if you&#8217;re using the Control button on the Keyboard Viewer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-3.png" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-616" title="Fast Dial" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/picture-3-300x236.png" alt="Fast Dial" width="300" height="236" /></a>In Firefox, I&#8217;ve installed the Fast Dial plugin to give me nine big links when you open a new tab, like Opera does, which I&#8217;ve set to go to YouTube, iPlayer and RadioTimes.  Saves typing them in each time or going through a menu of bookmarks that&#8217;s too small to see.  This plugin even gives you a screenshot of the site so you can see where you&#8217;re going before you get there.  I&#8217;ve also installed the Zoom Toolbar which gives me three handy buttons in the toolbar for zooming in and out of web pages &#8211; useful if you want to actually read what&#8217;s on the web page.</p>
<h2>In use</h2>
<p>Now that it&#8217;s all set up, I&#8217;m really pleased with it.  It plays DVDs nicely (and with less interference than with our actual DVD player), plays all the music shared by my G5 computer upstairs, and iPlayer quality looks fantastic on the TV &#8211; I&#8217;m not using the uber-high-quality version either.  It&#8217;s only a 21&#8243; TV and it&#8217;s not HD, so I guess any more quality than that would be wasted anyway.</p>
<p>Using a mouse as a remote is a little odd, but I&#8217;d get used to it.  It does give more control than a normal remote, but of course it does lack those instant control buttons that would make pausing and skipping chapters a little quicker &#8211; with the mouse I have to move it around (to wake it up) and then find the right button the on-screen controls before I can do anything.  Still, that&#8217;s a price I&#8217;m willing to pay for now.  I could invest in a wireless trackball mouse with programmeable buttons, but I doubt I&#8217;d be able to graft those buttons into the functionality of both iPlayer and YouTube.  So, a mouse it is, for now at least.</p>
<h2>In conclusion</h2>
<p>I only paid around £250 for the Mac Mini in the first place (second hand on eBay), and the only additional hardware I&#8217;ve needed to buy is the DVI to S-video converter and a few more cables.  My wife has graciously allowed me to use her wireless dongle with it, on the condition that I set up her laptop to use my old USR wireless dongle while she&#8217;s at work so that she doesn&#8217;t need to worry about it.  The fruit of my labour is that this morning I sat eating breakfast watching Top Gear on iPlayer from the comfort of my sofa.  It doesn&#8217;t get much better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/12/my-mac-mini-media-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Firefox 3 late?</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/is-firefox-3-late/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/is-firefox-3-late/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world record]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The geniuses (or should that be genii??) behind the Firefox project have come up with a nifty bit of marketing to get everyone to download the latest release of their web browser.  Instead of just releasing it, they&#8217;re hyping it up and going for a world record to see how many downloads they can accumulate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-509" style="float: right;" title="firefox-logo" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/firefox-logo.png" alt="Firefox logo" width="244" height="241" />The geniuses (or should that be genii??) behind the <a href="http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/products/firefox/">Firefox</a> project have come up with a nifty bit of marketing to get everyone to download the latest release of their web browser.  Instead of just releasing it, they&#8217;re hyping it up and going for a <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord">world record</a> to see how many downloads they can accumulate in the space of 24 hours.  Firefox 3, available for PC, Mac, and all those &#8216;other&#8217; operating systems, should be a massive step forward compared to Firefox 2, and challenges most other browsers too.  It claims to be faster than Safari on the Mac, and faster than IE7 on the PC, and with the enormous community base and a massive library of add-ons available, Firefox&#8217;s finger in the pie is surely set to grow.</p>
<p>However, there has been significant confusion in the world-wide-web community, because it&#8217;s still not available.  We were told that Firefox 3 would be available on 17th June.  It&#8217;s been 17th June all day, and here in the UK we&#8217;re running out of day in which to download the darn thing.  And yet there is no sign of it on the Firefox web site.  There are some clever people who have managed to locate the actual download separate from the web site, but that&#8217;s cheating somewhat, and I wonder whether those results will count in the world record stats.  Take a look at the <a href="http://techblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/06/firefox-3-being-released-today.html">comments on this news item</a> and you&#8217;ll see people from around the world thoroughly confused at the lack of the promised download, wondering how, why and who screwed it all up.</p>
<p><span id="more-508"></span>Read a little closer, however, and the reason becomes apparent.  Since the internet is a truly global phenomenon, the concept of a &#8216;date&#8217; and &#8216;time&#8217; is a little difficult to quantify, so for all useful purposes we have to tie it down to a particular physical location on the globe.  When the folks at Firefox said their browser would be available on 17th June, what they meant to say (they probably did say it, but ought to have made it a little clearer) was that it would be available from 1pm Eastern Time, as in the time zone inhabited by those people on the east coast of America, and the 24 hours being recorded for the world record will be measured from that time.  The upshot of that is that here in the UK it won&#8217;t be available until 6pm, and people further round the globe will probably have to wait until tomorrow, by their calendars.  Practically it does come out at exactly the same time across the world, it&#8217;s just that the measurement of time varies depending on where you are.  Confused?  So were a lot of other people.</p>
<p>As I write this I&#8217;m pleased to note that in theory there is less than an hour before FF3 is available.  It&#8217;s also less than an hour before everyone else gets it, but if you&#8217;re in Syndey, Australia it&#8217;s currently almost half past two in the morning, 18th June.  Obviously if they download their shiny new FF3 when they wake up then their download will still count for the record, but I can understand if the hard-core Firefoxers are somewhat disgruntled to have to wait a full day before being able to download what everyone else had yesterday.  Of course in the global sense that&#8217;s not quite accurate, but you know what I mean.</p>
<p>Basically, time is a bit silly, really.  What we really need is a way of fast-forwarding and rewinding time so that we can all experience the same 1pm on the same date at the same moment, just for special moments like this.  There&#8217;s a phrase that says &#8220;Time is nature&#8217;s way of making sure everything doesn&#8217;t happen at once&#8221;.  I hate to disagree with nature, but it would be cool to be able to experience life in a non-parallel fashion, dipping in and out of time as the fancy takes us.  That way I could get tomorrow&#8217;s work done yesterday so I don&#8217;t have to do it today.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/firefox3download.png" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-511" style="float: left;" title="firefox3download" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/firefox3download-150x150.png" alt="Firefox 3 download" width="150" height="150" /></a><strong>EDIT</strong>: It&#8217;s now 7:15pm and the Firefox web site has been updated.  Curiously though there seems to be some disparity between what&#8217;s advertised and what&#8217;s being offered.  Check out this screenshot from the front page, and note the version number listed &#8211; are they trying to tell us that Firefox 2 is the new Firefox 3??</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/firefox3download2.png" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-513" style="float: right;" title="firefox3download2" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/firefox3download2-150x142.png" alt="Firefox 3 download" width="150" height="142" /></a><strong>EDIT 2</strong>: Panic over!  It&#8217;s now 7:35pm and the Firefox web site shows the correct version of FF3 available for download.  Got there in the end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/is-firefox-3-late/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A review of new (and old) technology</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G5 Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at Novatech, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at <a href="http://www.novatech.co.uk">Novatech</a>, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD processor, 32MB of RAM, a 5.6GB hard disk, and ran Windows 95.  Not exactly impressive, even then.  Still, it did me fine for a year, though it did spend most of its life sat on my desk and wasn&#8217;t really mobile much.  After that came a 1.2GHz tower, with 128MB RAM, 20GB hard disk, and Windows XP.  Even though it was still entry-level it was a significant step up for me, and allowed me to play games.  Not very good games, but they were games nonetheless.</p>
<p>However, it wasn&#8217;t long before I grew tired of the plastic look of XP, and started modding my desktop with <a href="http://www.wincustomize.com/">all manner of programs</a>, making it look very little like Microsoft designed it to be.  Eventually I found myself themeing everything I could lay my hands on to make it look more like a Mac, striving for that perfect interface.  It was no surprise then when a few years later I bought my first Mac, a second hand G3 Blue&amp;White.  Although originally it would have been only 450MHz the previous owner had stuffed a 1GHz G4 upgrade chip from <a href="http://www.sonnettech.com/">Sonnet</a> in there, which made a big difference.  In terms of numbers it should have been slower than the PC it replaced, but in fact it was still faster and smoother and certainly more satisfying to use.  Hooray for Apple!</p>
<p><span id="more-504"></span><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-505" style="float: left;" title="mac_mini" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_mini.jpg" alt="Mac Mini" width="200" height="133" />Of course, avid blog readers will know that my little G3 didn&#8217;t last forever, and eventually ceased to switch on, at which point I bought the cheapest Mac I could lay my hands on at short notice &#8211; a 1.42GHz Mac Mini.  In terms of raw processing power the Mini was a little faster than the G3, but I noticed that it was still struggling under the weight of everything I was asking it to do.  It got there in the end, but lack of memory really bogged it down.  Clearly, 512MB of RAM just isn&#8217;t enough to run the 101 programs I use on a daily basis.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-506" style="float: right;" title="mac_pro" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_pro.jpg" alt="Mac Pro" width="120" height="200" />So, after some saving up and some careful <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk/">eBaying</a>, I finally took delivery of a G5 2GHz Dual Processor PPC running Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.3), with a whopping 2.5GHz of RAM and two 180GB hard disks.  This is actually the first time I&#8217;ve owned a high-end computer, and it makes such a difference.  It may not be brand spanking new, and it may be running on a PPC chip rather than Intel, but it rocks nonetheless.  So I thought I&#8217;d share a few of the highlights with you, along with some short reviews of the software I&#8217;ve been using so far that I haven&#8217;t reviewed already.</p>
<h2>Mac OS X Leopard</h2>
<p>At first glance the OS looks more or less the same as Tiger.  Everything is in much the same place as before, it works in pretty much the same way, and visually it&#8217;s all still very much recognisable.  Unlike the whole XP/Vista thing.  But it would be a mistake to say that Apple haven&#8217;t done much to release Leopard.  It&#8217;s all those little things they&#8217;ve done which add up to something quite spectacular.  The interface is mor consistent, the way the Finder works is a little more polished, the Dock has a bit more sparkle and fun in it, and there are some extra built-in apps that make life just a little bit simpler than they were with Tiger.</p>
<p>I actually spent quite a lot of time on Tiger trying to emulate some of the new features Leopard brought in, such as the unified interface (courtesy of UNO), backups (with a little help from iBackup), even Stacks (by simply putting a folder onto the Dock).  I&#8217;m pleased to report that the Leopard versions are the original and best.  Time Machine really is a one-click setup; I plugged my firewire drive in, Time Machine recognised it and asked me if I would like to use it for backups, and that was it.  I did look for extra options, but there weren&#8217;t any.  It just works.</p>
<p>The Dock was something that caught my eye when Leopard was first demoed by Steve Jobs.  No longer just a flat semi-transparent panel (as cool as that was), the new Dock is more like a shelf, complete with reflections of both the icons and the windows on the screen.  Very cool.  Not exactly a boost to performance or efficiency, and no doubt the novelty will wear off after a while, but it&#8217;s one of those little extras that make the whole experience just that little bit more satisfying.  It&#8217;s like finding that the cup holders in your car also have a slot for holding a stirring spoon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite so entranced by Stacks, though, I have to admit.  Sure, they look pretty sweet and have cool animations, but are they really necessary?  To my mind they&#8217;re a fun feature, but one that I would prefer to be able to turn on and off.</p>
<p>Another useful feature found in Leopard is the screen sharing option.  With another computer on the network you can log in and share the screen of the other computer, which apparently happens courtesy of the VNC protocol.  I&#8217;ve been unable to get this working seamlessly so far, unfortunately; I&#8217;ve got my Mac Mini on the network still, but I can&#8217;t directly log into it, I have to &#8216;ask permission&#8217; and wait for it to be confirmed on the other computer.  That&#8217;s fine if your other computer has a screen, but my Mini doesn&#8217;t at the moment, so I have to either unplug the keyboard and monitor from the G5 and plug into the Mini just to confirm it and then plug it all back again, or use another VNC client to log in a different way.  I&#8217;m sure there must be a solution there somewhere, I just haven&#8217;t got to the bottom of it.  Incidentally, screen sharing with a PC works just fine.</p>
<p>Other built-in apps have also been given subtle make-overs, including Mail, iChat, Address Book and iCal.  Oh and the computer came preinstalled with iLife &#8216;08 too, plus a few other useful packages that nicely upgrade what I had before.</p>
<h2>The G5</h2>
<p>Right, I ought to say a quick something about the computer itself.  To start off with, it&#8217;s heavy.  Not just compared to the Mini, but compared to any other computer I&#8217;ve known.  That&#8217;s largely thanks to its metal case, but it also stands considerably taller than my old G3 Blue&amp;White (which I still have, gathering dust).  Still, what makes it stand out even more than that is the sheer quality of it.  I took the side off and found myself looking at the most tidy and well thought out inside of a computer I have ever seen.  Beautiful.  Gorgeous.  Stunning.  While most PCs look like the inside of a Radio Shack back room, the G5 looks like an executive jet.  There are no random wires connecting odds and ends together, no unnecessary big empty spaces, no mess of IDE cables.  Just pure, simple elegance of design.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I had a reason for looking inside the case, beyond the basic intrigue.  The CD drive wouldn&#8217;t open; it just clunked and did nothing.  Further inspection showed that the drive must have shifted in transit and was sitting a little too high so that the tray was hitting the casing and not coming through the gap.  Corrective surgery was needed, but thanks to the G5&#8217;s marvellous interior designers this proved to be easy as pie.  No screwdriver was necessary, just flick a couple of latches and the whole CD unit unlocked itself and became free.  I was then able to reposition it, relatch it, and it all worked fine.  Nice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also got an Airport wireless card, Bluetooth, and a selection of USB and Firewire ports.  Which are all very useful too.</p>
<h2>Firefox 3</h2>
<p>I know this isn&#8217;t quite on topic, but I thought it was worth a mention anyway.  While installing all my usual programs onto my fresh Leopard I found that <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/">Firefox</a> was offering its <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-rc.html">release candidate of version 3</a>.  I had previously been a great advocate of <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/">Camino</a>, what many would call the Mac version of Firefox, and had an alpha release of Firefox 3 for testing purposes.  There were problems with it though, and I stayed with Camino for the sake of stability and consistency.  However, now that FF RC3 is out, Camino hasn&#8217;t been used here much at all.</p>
<p>FF3 is a marked improvement over FF2 on the Mac.  Although FF2 remains arguably the best browser for the PC, on the Mac it was awful.  It was slow, it forgot where it put its memory (ah, the irony), and looked hideous.  FF3 promised a lot, and seems to have delivered on most of its early promises, giving Mac users a browser that looks good, feels responsive, and gives Safari some serious competition on the performance front.  And on top of all that you get that huge repository of addons just in case the basic functionality isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>So FF3 is set to become my primary browser for the time being, even though it is still on a Release Candidate (which basically means it&#8217;s not completely finished yet, but they&#8217;re happy for people to test it for them).</p>
<h2>The end</h2>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s it for now.  Of all of that, only FF3 is actually new news, the rest has been common knowledge for a while now, it just hasn&#8217;t been on my desk until now.  Still, it&#8217;s so nice to finally have a computer that is more than capable of running everything I throw at it.  I&#8217;ve got iStat meters in my menu bar showing what my two processors are up to, and so far they have yet to break a sweat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making time for&#8230; everything</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/04/making-time-for-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/04/making-time-for-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerbils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Work has generally been quite busy recently.  Which is a good thing.  More work means more money.  However, there is more to life than work, and there are a whole load more things I need to squeeze into my week than just work.  I&#8217;d like to share just a few of this week&#8217;s additional bits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work has generally been quite busy recently.  Which is a good thing.  More work means more money.  However, there is more to life than work, and there are a whole load more things I need to squeeze into my week than just work.  I&#8217;d like to share just a few of this week&#8217;s additional bits and bobs with you.  It gives me something to do after all.</p>
<p>This afternoon I took the opportunity to put work on hold briefly while I went outside and mowed the lawn.  It has needed doing for a while now, and I&#8217;ve been putting it off, but today I figured I ought to take advantage of the sunshine and get out there while I can.  Looking at the forecast, the weekend isn&#8217;t going to be too promising.  The lawn actually needs treating at some point, as one half of it looks to be more moss than grass.  We&#8217;ve got some moss-killer, it&#8217;s just a case of spraying it on and letting it do its job.  I didn&#8217;t get round to that today, but I did cut the grass and do the edges, so the garden is looking nice now.  I also noticed that the peas in our vegetable patch are beginning to grow too!  We&#8217;ve got carrots and parsnips in there too, but I only planted them last week so it&#8217;s no surprise they&#8217;re not topside yet.</p>
<p><span id="more-444"></span>This weekend is going to be pretty busy too.  Saturday I&#8217;m off to a friend&#8217;s stag do, which promises to be lots of fun, if somewhat energetic&#8230; I&#8217;m not giving any details, just in case the person in question doesn&#8217;t know about it all yet.  In fact, part 2 of the stag do is on the Sunday, so it&#8217;ll be a hefty weekend of fun and frolics, and a fair amount of driving too.</p>
<p>Also on Sunday I&#8217;m skipping church.  Doesn&#8217;t happen often, but occasionally I take a day off to go to a Mini event, pretty much all of which tend to be on Sundays.  This weekend it&#8217;s the <a href="http://colchesterminiclub.co.uk/events.html">Manningtree High School Vehicle Show</a>, and Colchester Mini Club will have a stand there with several of our Minis on display, mine included.  Which means at some point I really ought to clean the car.  I&#8217;ve also got a couple of electrical items to install eventually, now that I&#8217;ve got all the required bits and pieces for it: I&#8217;ve got a rear brake light to go in the back window, some LED side repeaters, a cigarette lighter socket, and all the necessary wires and connectors for installing it.  All good fun.  But since I&#8217;m going to be out all Saturday I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll have time to install them before the show.  Never mind.  It&#8217;s not a particularly big show, and apparently it&#8217;s going to rain anyway.  Ah well, there&#8217;s always next time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ff3withuno.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-445" style="float: right;" title="Firefox 3 with UNO" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ff3withuno-150x150.jpg" alt="Firefox 3 with UNO" width="150" height="150" /></a>On the computer front, I&#8217;m now testing out <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html">Firefox 3 beta 5</a>.  It&#8217;s not quite finished yet, and isn&#8217;t even a Release Candidate, but it&#8217;s interesting seeing where they&#8217;re going with it and what improvements they&#8217;ve made.  For a start, it&#8217;s much quicker than FF2 was on the Mac, and significantly faster than previous betas too, which is good.  Speed and responsiveness was one of the main reasons I stopped using Firefox on the Mac in the first place and switched to <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/">Camino</a>.  There are still some bugs to iron out before it goes live (I&#8217;ve seen some problems handling frames), but the big thing I don&#8217;t like at the moment is that it won&#8217;t work with <a href="http://gui.interacto.net/">UNO</a>.  For those of you who don&#8217;t know, UNO is a cool little extra that straps itself (harmlessly) into Mac OS X Tiger and allows you to unify the messy interface, getting rid of the brushed metal windows and allowing me to make everything look consistent.  Unfortunately, FF3 seems to break UNO &#8211; it&#8217;s not dangerous or particularly problematic, just an annoying visual thing.  Basically, UNO is supposed to unify &#8211; join together &#8211; the top part of the window and the menu bar underneath.  As standard FF3 does this anyway, which is nice, but as soon as UNO is working, regardless of whether it&#8217;s actually supposed to be doing anything with Firefox, that unity is lost.  Curious.  Without UNO, FF3 displays unified, but nothing else does.  With UNO, everything displays unified except FF3.  Grrr.  As I say, not a huge problem, just a niggling frustration, but one I&#8217;m hoping will be sorted by the time FF3 is released properly.</p>
<p>Finally, on to this blog.  Astute blog readers will notice that I&#8217;ve changed the theme back to the way it was last week.  Sorry.  It just got to the stage where I was annoyed by enough of the new design to warrant just reverting back to the previous design.  I&#8217;m working on ideas for a refreshed theme, which I&#8217;ll be designing myself (rather than picking an off-the-shelf theme), and you&#8217;ll be pleased to know that I&#8217;ve found a way of testing themes without the general public seeing them, which should allow me to develop it and test it before actually letting it loose on you lot and letting you pick holes in it.  So, again, apologies for messing you around with visual styles, but hopefully the end result will be better.</p>
<p>Right, after all that, I need another cup of tea.  And maybe I&#8217;ll see if I can persuade the gerbils out &#8211; Ellie&#8217;s much better at it than I am, but she&#8217;s at work and the girls need the exercise.  Time to show the little furballs who&#8217;s boss&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/04/making-time-for-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
