<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>minipix.co.uk &#187; computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/tag/computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk</link>
	<description>All the best things come in small packages.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New laptop!</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2009/03/new-laptop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2009/03/new-laptop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#8217;ve bought myself a laptop.  A brand new laptop, no less.  Running Vista.  Am I mad?  Well, no more than usual, it seems.  Because despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the idea that I was just jealous because two of my friends had also bought new computers recently (and my wife has a better mobile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-639" title="hp-laptop" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/hp-laptop.jpg" alt="hp-laptop" width="150" height="131" />Yes, I&#8217;ve bought myself a laptop.  A <a href="http://www.ebuyer.com/product/158888">brand new laptop</a>, no less.  Running Vista.  Am I mad?  Well, no more than usual, it seems.  Because despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the idea that I was just jealous because two of my friends had also bought new computers recently (and my wife has a better mobile phone than I do), I have a sound and reasonable reason for needing a laptop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not actually owned a laptop since my first year at uni, which was when I bought my very first computer &#8211; a bottom of the range Novatech notebook with a 366MHz AMD processor, 32MB RAM, Windows 95, and very little besides.  It was £600 too, which on reflection wasn&#8217;t actually the bargain I thought it was at the time.  Still, I got a good year of use out of it, getting it to do all sorts of things it wasn&#8217;t supposed to be capable of, like running all sorts of Windows 98 programs and running a skinning addon that made it look like Windows XP (which was very new at the time).  Since then I&#8217;ve only had desktops, and most have been Macs.</p>
<p>This new laptop (which I&#8217;m writing this blog post on, sat in my lounge on my comfy sofa), achieves two primary uses, plus a few other smaller ones.  <span id="more-638"></span>Firstly, it replaces my old PC, a 1.2GHz tower running XP very slowly indeed, despite a recent reinstall and a very minimal set of programs.  Clearly the hundreds of security updates to XP have taken their toll and made a once powerful computer into a walk through treacle.  So this laptop will enable me to continue being able to test web sites in Internet Explorer (which isn&#8217;t available on the Mac).  It&#8217;s second main purpose is that I can potentially take it to meetings &#8211; after all, it&#8217;s good for a web designer to be seen to have a computer!</p>
<p>Of course, there are other perks to having a laptop, which have already surfaced this evening.  I&#8217;ve already enjoyed the luxury and novelty of being able to sit downstairs and use the computer, which is slightly more sociable than hiding away in the study.  Ellie and I have also tested out the built-in webcam by Skyping my parents and having a nice half-hour video chat with them.  Lots of fun!  We were going to try the same with my Grandma immediately afterwards, but I don&#8217;t think she was actually in front of her computer at the time.</p>
<p>My next job will be to give an evaluation of Vista.  Yes, I know every Tom, Dick and Harry has already done that, but I haven&#8217;t.  I do of course have my own pre-conceived ideas and prejudices, especially because I&#8217;m primarily a Mac user now, but this is my first real experience of actually using Vista, so I figure it makes sense to muddy the waters with my own opinions on what it&#8217;s actually like, now that the hype has died down almost completely.  But I&#8217;ll leave that for another post.  Maybe the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2009/03/new-laptop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Into the realms of now</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2009/03/into-the-realms-of-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2009/03/into-the-realms-of-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#8217;t say I was backwards, exactly, but I do have some very old technology sitting in my study, some of which is still in regular(ish) use.  To take an example, I have a PC sitting on my desk that is almost 7 years old.  Granted it&#8217;s only used for testing web sites, but it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say I was backwards, exactly, but I do have some very old technology sitting in my study, some of which is still in regular(ish) use.  To take an example, I have a PC sitting on my desk that is almost 7 years old.  Granted it&#8217;s only used for testing web sites, but it&#8217;s got to the stage where it&#8217;s struggling just to do that, and that&#8217;s taking into account that I reinstalled everything fairly recently too.</p>
<p>I also have an old Palm m125 which I&#8217;ve been carrying around with me to act as my diary, syncing it to my Mac when I remember to.  It does the job, just about, despite being older than the PC (it would have been new in 2001).  I say it does the job, actually it&#8217;s been throwing tantrums just lately, refusing to switch on and then losing everything in memory and thus any changes I&#8217;ve made since the last sync.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s my mobile phone, a Motorola L6.  Granted, it&#8217;s nowhere near as old as the aforementioned relics, but I did buy it back in 2006, so it&#8217;s a few years older than your average mobile.  I still reckon it&#8217;s got at least another year of use in it though, despite the paint coming off the bottom, a dodgy battery connection (sort of fixed by stuffing some paper between the battery and the cover) and a dead camera.</p>
<p><span id="more-633"></span>Anyway, the point of all this is that I&#8217;ve been looking at laptops this afternoon.  My poor old PC really does need replacing, and a laptop would actually be useful now.  I&#8217;ve steered clear of them in recent years, simply because I&#8217;m not mobile enough to warrant having one, but now it may serve a purpose.  There are occasions when being able to take a laptop to meetings with clients would be an advantage.  So it would be a case of combining the need for a new computer to test web sites on with the ability to take stuff to meetings.  I&#8217;d need something cheap, small, able to run Vista, XP and Linux.  Vista is important for future-proofing, allowing me to continue supporting stuff in years to come, while XP is needed so I can continue to test sites in IE6 (although I have found some software that emulates IE6 that works in Vista).</p>
<p>The Palm will probably be taken out of service before too long, though hopefully replaced by my mobile phone rather than another palm-top organiser.  All I really need is my diary synced to a device I can carry around with me, and if I get a Bluetooth dongle I can do that with my L6.</p>
<p>Of course, then there&#8217;s the question of what I do with the old technology.  I&#8217;m not even entertaining the idea of just throwing it away, far too much goes to landfill as it is.  Thankfully I&#8217;ve found several organisations that will take at least some of my relics away for either recycling or reuse.  My PC can be reconditioned and resold, as can the two CRT monitors gathering dust in the study, and hopefully some of the other bits and pieces can go the same way.  Only a small amount would need disposing of, like my old Epson printer which can&#8217;t be fixed.</p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s the way the future&#8217;s looking for me &#8211; out with the old and in with the new.  Although, knowing me, it&#8217;ll probably happen in reverse order.  Still, it&#8217;s a good plan, especially given that we&#8217;re planning on moving house in a few months&#8217; time &#8211; the less junk we have to transport the better.</p>
<p><strong>EDIT</strong>: I have now purchased a new laptop!  Yay!  Should be here within 5 working days.  It&#8217;s nothing too fancy, more for business than anything else, but should give me everything I need.  It comes with Vista, which is important from a support point of view, and I&#8217;ve discovered that I can run IE6 on Ubuntu via the Wine emulator, so hopefully that should mean I don&#8217;t need to install XP as well &#8211; which is good because licensing restrictions mean I can&#8217;t install the version I&#8217;ve already got.  No doubt I&#8217;ll post an update once the laptop arrives and let you all know what I think of Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2009/03/into-the-realms-of-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A review of new (and old) technology</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G5 Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at Novatech, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at <a href="http://www.novatech.co.uk">Novatech</a>, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD processor, 32MB of RAM, a 5.6GB hard disk, and ran Windows 95.  Not exactly impressive, even then.  Still, it did me fine for a year, though it did spend most of its life sat on my desk and wasn&#8217;t really mobile much.  After that came a 1.2GHz tower, with 128MB RAM, 20GB hard disk, and Windows XP.  Even though it was still entry-level it was a significant step up for me, and allowed me to play games.  Not very good games, but they were games nonetheless.</p>
<p>However, it wasn&#8217;t long before I grew tired of the plastic look of XP, and started modding my desktop with <a href="http://www.wincustomize.com/">all manner of programs</a>, making it look very little like Microsoft designed it to be.  Eventually I found myself themeing everything I could lay my hands on to make it look more like a Mac, striving for that perfect interface.  It was no surprise then when a few years later I bought my first Mac, a second hand G3 Blue&amp;White.  Although originally it would have been only 450MHz the previous owner had stuffed a 1GHz G4 upgrade chip from <a href="http://www.sonnettech.com/">Sonnet</a> in there, which made a big difference.  In terms of numbers it should have been slower than the PC it replaced, but in fact it was still faster and smoother and certainly more satisfying to use.  Hooray for Apple!</p>
<p><span id="more-504"></span><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-505" style="float: left;" title="mac_mini" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_mini.jpg" alt="Mac Mini" width="200" height="133" />Of course, avid blog readers will know that my little G3 didn&#8217;t last forever, and eventually ceased to switch on, at which point I bought the cheapest Mac I could lay my hands on at short notice &#8211; a 1.42GHz Mac Mini.  In terms of raw processing power the Mini was a little faster than the G3, but I noticed that it was still struggling under the weight of everything I was asking it to do.  It got there in the end, but lack of memory really bogged it down.  Clearly, 512MB of RAM just isn&#8217;t enough to run the 101 programs I use on a daily basis.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-506" style="float: right;" title="mac_pro" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_pro.jpg" alt="Mac Pro" width="120" height="200" />So, after some saving up and some careful <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk/">eBaying</a>, I finally took delivery of a G5 2GHz Dual Processor PPC running Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.3), with a whopping 2.5GHz of RAM and two 180GB hard disks.  This is actually the first time I&#8217;ve owned a high-end computer, and it makes such a difference.  It may not be brand spanking new, and it may be running on a PPC chip rather than Intel, but it rocks nonetheless.  So I thought I&#8217;d share a few of the highlights with you, along with some short reviews of the software I&#8217;ve been using so far that I haven&#8217;t reviewed already.</p>
<h2>Mac OS X Leopard</h2>
<p>At first glance the OS looks more or less the same as Tiger.  Everything is in much the same place as before, it works in pretty much the same way, and visually it&#8217;s all still very much recognisable.  Unlike the whole XP/Vista thing.  But it would be a mistake to say that Apple haven&#8217;t done much to release Leopard.  It&#8217;s all those little things they&#8217;ve done which add up to something quite spectacular.  The interface is mor consistent, the way the Finder works is a little more polished, the Dock has a bit more sparkle and fun in it, and there are some extra built-in apps that make life just a little bit simpler than they were with Tiger.</p>
<p>I actually spent quite a lot of time on Tiger trying to emulate some of the new features Leopard brought in, such as the unified interface (courtesy of UNO), backups (with a little help from iBackup), even Stacks (by simply putting a folder onto the Dock).  I&#8217;m pleased to report that the Leopard versions are the original and best.  Time Machine really is a one-click setup; I plugged my firewire drive in, Time Machine recognised it and asked me if I would like to use it for backups, and that was it.  I did look for extra options, but there weren&#8217;t any.  It just works.</p>
<p>The Dock was something that caught my eye when Leopard was first demoed by Steve Jobs.  No longer just a flat semi-transparent panel (as cool as that was), the new Dock is more like a shelf, complete with reflections of both the icons and the windows on the screen.  Very cool.  Not exactly a boost to performance or efficiency, and no doubt the novelty will wear off after a while, but it&#8217;s one of those little extras that make the whole experience just that little bit more satisfying.  It&#8217;s like finding that the cup holders in your car also have a slot for holding a stirring spoon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite so entranced by Stacks, though, I have to admit.  Sure, they look pretty sweet and have cool animations, but are they really necessary?  To my mind they&#8217;re a fun feature, but one that I would prefer to be able to turn on and off.</p>
<p>Another useful feature found in Leopard is the screen sharing option.  With another computer on the network you can log in and share the screen of the other computer, which apparently happens courtesy of the VNC protocol.  I&#8217;ve been unable to get this working seamlessly so far, unfortunately; I&#8217;ve got my Mac Mini on the network still, but I can&#8217;t directly log into it, I have to &#8216;ask permission&#8217; and wait for it to be confirmed on the other computer.  That&#8217;s fine if your other computer has a screen, but my Mini doesn&#8217;t at the moment, so I have to either unplug the keyboard and monitor from the G5 and plug into the Mini just to confirm it and then plug it all back again, or use another VNC client to log in a different way.  I&#8217;m sure there must be a solution there somewhere, I just haven&#8217;t got to the bottom of it.  Incidentally, screen sharing with a PC works just fine.</p>
<p>Other built-in apps have also been given subtle make-overs, including Mail, iChat, Address Book and iCal.  Oh and the computer came preinstalled with iLife &#8216;08 too, plus a few other useful packages that nicely upgrade what I had before.</p>
<h2>The G5</h2>
<p>Right, I ought to say a quick something about the computer itself.  To start off with, it&#8217;s heavy.  Not just compared to the Mini, but compared to any other computer I&#8217;ve known.  That&#8217;s largely thanks to its metal case, but it also stands considerably taller than my old G3 Blue&amp;White (which I still have, gathering dust).  Still, what makes it stand out even more than that is the sheer quality of it.  I took the side off and found myself looking at the most tidy and well thought out inside of a computer I have ever seen.  Beautiful.  Gorgeous.  Stunning.  While most PCs look like the inside of a Radio Shack back room, the G5 looks like an executive jet.  There are no random wires connecting odds and ends together, no unnecessary big empty spaces, no mess of IDE cables.  Just pure, simple elegance of design.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I had a reason for looking inside the case, beyond the basic intrigue.  The CD drive wouldn&#8217;t open; it just clunked and did nothing.  Further inspection showed that the drive must have shifted in transit and was sitting a little too high so that the tray was hitting the casing and not coming through the gap.  Corrective surgery was needed, but thanks to the G5&#8217;s marvellous interior designers this proved to be easy as pie.  No screwdriver was necessary, just flick a couple of latches and the whole CD unit unlocked itself and became free.  I was then able to reposition it, relatch it, and it all worked fine.  Nice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also got an Airport wireless card, Bluetooth, and a selection of USB and Firewire ports.  Which are all very useful too.</p>
<h2>Firefox 3</h2>
<p>I know this isn&#8217;t quite on topic, but I thought it was worth a mention anyway.  While installing all my usual programs onto my fresh Leopard I found that <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/">Firefox</a> was offering its <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-rc.html">release candidate of version 3</a>.  I had previously been a great advocate of <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/">Camino</a>, what many would call the Mac version of Firefox, and had an alpha release of Firefox 3 for testing purposes.  There were problems with it though, and I stayed with Camino for the sake of stability and consistency.  However, now that FF RC3 is out, Camino hasn&#8217;t been used here much at all.</p>
<p>FF3 is a marked improvement over FF2 on the Mac.  Although FF2 remains arguably the best browser for the PC, on the Mac it was awful.  It was slow, it forgot where it put its memory (ah, the irony), and looked hideous.  FF3 promised a lot, and seems to have delivered on most of its early promises, giving Mac users a browser that looks good, feels responsive, and gives Safari some serious competition on the performance front.  And on top of all that you get that huge repository of addons just in case the basic functionality isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>So FF3 is set to become my primary browser for the time being, even though it is still on a Release Candidate (which basically means it&#8217;s not completely finished yet, but they&#8217;re happy for people to test it for them).</p>
<h2>The end</h2>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s it for now.  Of all of that, only FF3 is actually new news, the rest has been common knowledge for a while now, it just hasn&#8217;t been on my desk until now.  Still, it&#8217;s so nice to finally have a computer that is more than capable of running everything I throw at it.  I&#8217;ve got iStat meters in my menu bar showing what my two processors are up to, and so far they have yet to break a sweat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
