<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>minipix.co.uk &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk</link>
	<description>All the best things come in small packages.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A review of new (and old) technology</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G5 Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at Novatech, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the years I&#8217;ve owned a motley collection of computers.  My first (other than family computers) was a little laptop I came to university with.  It was relatively cheap, being in an end-of-line sale at <a href="http://www.novatech.co.uk">Novatech</a>, so it wasn&#8217;t exactly state of the art by the time I bought it.  It had a 360MHz AMD processor, 32MB of RAM, a 5.6GB hard disk, and ran Windows 95.  Not exactly impressive, even then.  Still, it did me fine for a year, though it did spend most of its life sat on my desk and wasn&#8217;t really mobile much.  After that came a 1.2GHz tower, with 128MB RAM, 20GB hard disk, and Windows XP.  Even though it was still entry-level it was a significant step up for me, and allowed me to play games.  Not very good games, but they were games nonetheless.</p>
<p>However, it wasn&#8217;t long before I grew tired of the plastic look of XP, and started modding my desktop with <a href="http://www.wincustomize.com/">all manner of programs</a>, making it look very little like Microsoft designed it to be.  Eventually I found myself themeing everything I could lay my hands on to make it look more like a Mac, striving for that perfect interface.  It was no surprise then when a few years later I bought my first Mac, a second hand G3 Blue&amp;White.  Although originally it would have been only 450MHz the previous owner had stuffed a 1GHz G4 upgrade chip from <a href="http://www.sonnettech.com/">Sonnet</a> in there, which made a big difference.  In terms of numbers it should have been slower than the PC it replaced, but in fact it was still faster and smoother and certainly more satisfying to use.  Hooray for Apple!</p>
<p><span id="more-504"></span><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-505" style="float: left;" title="mac_mini" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_mini.jpg" alt="Mac Mini" width="200" height="133" />Of course, avid blog readers will know that my little G3 didn&#8217;t last forever, and eventually ceased to switch on, at which point I bought the cheapest Mac I could lay my hands on at short notice &#8211; a 1.42GHz Mac Mini.  In terms of raw processing power the Mini was a little faster than the G3, but I noticed that it was still struggling under the weight of everything I was asking it to do.  It got there in the end, but lack of memory really bogged it down.  Clearly, 512MB of RAM just isn&#8217;t enough to run the 101 programs I use on a daily basis.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-506" style="float: right;" title="mac_pro" src="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/mac_pro.jpg" alt="Mac Pro" width="120" height="200" />So, after some saving up and some careful <a href="http://www.ebay.co.uk/">eBaying</a>, I finally took delivery of a G5 2GHz Dual Processor PPC running Mac OS X Leopard (10.5.3), with a whopping 2.5GHz of RAM and two 180GB hard disks.  This is actually the first time I&#8217;ve owned a high-end computer, and it makes such a difference.  It may not be brand spanking new, and it may be running on a PPC chip rather than Intel, but it rocks nonetheless.  So I thought I&#8217;d share a few of the highlights with you, along with some short reviews of the software I&#8217;ve been using so far that I haven&#8217;t reviewed already.</p>
<h2>Mac OS X Leopard</h2>
<p>At first glance the OS looks more or less the same as Tiger.  Everything is in much the same place as before, it works in pretty much the same way, and visually it&#8217;s all still very much recognisable.  Unlike the whole XP/Vista thing.  But it would be a mistake to say that Apple haven&#8217;t done much to release Leopard.  It&#8217;s all those little things they&#8217;ve done which add up to something quite spectacular.  The interface is mor consistent, the way the Finder works is a little more polished, the Dock has a bit more sparkle and fun in it, and there are some extra built-in apps that make life just a little bit simpler than they were with Tiger.</p>
<p>I actually spent quite a lot of time on Tiger trying to emulate some of the new features Leopard brought in, such as the unified interface (courtesy of UNO), backups (with a little help from iBackup), even Stacks (by simply putting a folder onto the Dock).  I&#8217;m pleased to report that the Leopard versions are the original and best.  Time Machine really is a one-click setup; I plugged my firewire drive in, Time Machine recognised it and asked me if I would like to use it for backups, and that was it.  I did look for extra options, but there weren&#8217;t any.  It just works.</p>
<p>The Dock was something that caught my eye when Leopard was first demoed by Steve Jobs.  No longer just a flat semi-transparent panel (as cool as that was), the new Dock is more like a shelf, complete with reflections of both the icons and the windows on the screen.  Very cool.  Not exactly a boost to performance or efficiency, and no doubt the novelty will wear off after a while, but it&#8217;s one of those little extras that make the whole experience just that little bit more satisfying.  It&#8217;s like finding that the cup holders in your car also have a slot for holding a stirring spoon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite so entranced by Stacks, though, I have to admit.  Sure, they look pretty sweet and have cool animations, but are they really necessary?  To my mind they&#8217;re a fun feature, but one that I would prefer to be able to turn on and off.</p>
<p>Another useful feature found in Leopard is the screen sharing option.  With another computer on the network you can log in and share the screen of the other computer, which apparently happens courtesy of the VNC protocol.  I&#8217;ve been unable to get this working seamlessly so far, unfortunately; I&#8217;ve got my Mac Mini on the network still, but I can&#8217;t directly log into it, I have to &#8216;ask permission&#8217; and wait for it to be confirmed on the other computer.  That&#8217;s fine if your other computer has a screen, but my Mini doesn&#8217;t at the moment, so I have to either unplug the keyboard and monitor from the G5 and plug into the Mini just to confirm it and then plug it all back again, or use another VNC client to log in a different way.  I&#8217;m sure there must be a solution there somewhere, I just haven&#8217;t got to the bottom of it.  Incidentally, screen sharing with a PC works just fine.</p>
<p>Other built-in apps have also been given subtle make-overs, including Mail, iChat, Address Book and iCal.  Oh and the computer came preinstalled with iLife &#8216;08 too, plus a few other useful packages that nicely upgrade what I had before.</p>
<h2>The G5</h2>
<p>Right, I ought to say a quick something about the computer itself.  To start off with, it&#8217;s heavy.  Not just compared to the Mini, but compared to any other computer I&#8217;ve known.  That&#8217;s largely thanks to its metal case, but it also stands considerably taller than my old G3 Blue&amp;White (which I still have, gathering dust).  Still, what makes it stand out even more than that is the sheer quality of it.  I took the side off and found myself looking at the most tidy and well thought out inside of a computer I have ever seen.  Beautiful.  Gorgeous.  Stunning.  While most PCs look like the inside of a Radio Shack back room, the G5 looks like an executive jet.  There are no random wires connecting odds and ends together, no unnecessary big empty spaces, no mess of IDE cables.  Just pure, simple elegance of design.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I had a reason for looking inside the case, beyond the basic intrigue.  The CD drive wouldn&#8217;t open; it just clunked and did nothing.  Further inspection showed that the drive must have shifted in transit and was sitting a little too high so that the tray was hitting the casing and not coming through the gap.  Corrective surgery was needed, but thanks to the G5&#8217;s marvellous interior designers this proved to be easy as pie.  No screwdriver was necessary, just flick a couple of latches and the whole CD unit unlocked itself and became free.  I was then able to reposition it, relatch it, and it all worked fine.  Nice.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also got an Airport wireless card, Bluetooth, and a selection of USB and Firewire ports.  Which are all very useful too.</p>
<h2>Firefox 3</h2>
<p>I know this isn&#8217;t quite on topic, but I thought it was worth a mention anyway.  While installing all my usual programs onto my fresh Leopard I found that <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/">Firefox</a> was offering its <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-rc.html">release candidate of version 3</a>.  I had previously been a great advocate of <a href="http://caminobrowser.org/">Camino</a>, what many would call the Mac version of Firefox, and had an alpha release of Firefox 3 for testing purposes.  There were problems with it though, and I stayed with Camino for the sake of stability and consistency.  However, now that FF RC3 is out, Camino hasn&#8217;t been used here much at all.</p>
<p>FF3 is a marked improvement over FF2 on the Mac.  Although FF2 remains arguably the best browser for the PC, on the Mac it was awful.  It was slow, it forgot where it put its memory (ah, the irony), and looked hideous.  FF3 promised a lot, and seems to have delivered on most of its early promises, giving Mac users a browser that looks good, feels responsive, and gives Safari some serious competition on the performance front.  And on top of all that you get that huge repository of addons just in case the basic functionality isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>So FF3 is set to become my primary browser for the time being, even though it is still on a Release Candidate (which basically means it&#8217;s not completely finished yet, but they&#8217;re happy for people to test it for them).</p>
<h2>The end</h2>
<p>Yep, that&#8217;s it for now.  Of all of that, only FF3 is actually new news, the rest has been common knowledge for a while now, it just hasn&#8217;t been on my desk until now.  Still, it&#8217;s so nice to finally have a computer that is more than capable of running everything I throw at it.  I&#8217;ve got iStat meters in my menu bar showing what my two processors are up to, and so far they have yet to break a sweat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/06/a-review-of-new-and-old-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to a tower</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/back-to-a-tower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/back-to-a-tower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerMac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned the other day that I was considering buying myself an iMac, to replace my current Mac Mini that is suffering from a lack of memory.  The idea behind this was that it would work out cheaper than a full-blown Mac Pro, which would provide far more power than I would really need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned the other day that I was <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/">considering buying myself an iMac</a>, to replace my current Mac Mini that is suffering from a lack of memory.  The idea behind this was that it would work out cheaper than a full-blown Mac Pro, which would provide far more power than I would really need for my day-to-day work.  Looking around on eBay proved that I might be able to stretch to a nice iMac, so all was looking tentatively rosy.  Until my Dad left a comment, that is.</p>
<p>He recommended looking at a PowerMac G5, which isn&#8217;t brand new but would provide plenty of power and retain the ability to upgrade in the future.  I was a little dubious to begin with, but a quick look at eBay showed that a typical PowerMac G5 was actually cheaper than a comparatively priced iMac.  Tempting.</p>
<p><span id="more-488"></span>In fact, it wasn&#8217;t long before I realised I was looking at something I knew I was destined to purchase.  A PowerMac from June 2004, with a dual 2GHz G5 (PPC) processor, 2.5GB RAM, two 160GB hard disks, Mac OS 10.5 &#8216;Leopard&#8217;, and a few pre-installed programs.  Not only was this pretty much exactly what I was looking for, but it was cheaper than I had expected to find it.  I looked at the photos.  I checked some other listings.  I came back and looked at the specs again.  I checked my e-mails.  I came back again and made sure it was still there.  No amount of procrastination was going to change the fact that it was exactly what I wanted, at a price I could afford.</p>
<p>So I went downstairs to make myself a cup of tea.</p>
<p>At that point my wife told me off for procrastinating and told me to go and buy the computer before someone else did.  So I did.  The only snag in the process is that PayPal only allows me to pay for items up to £500 on their basic account &#8211; to purchase anything more expensive than that I need to pay them for the privilege.  Grrr.  So I&#8217;ve contacted the seller and I&#8217;m going to see if I can pay by cheque or bank transfer or something.  Either way I&#8217;ve committed to buy it, so it&#8217;s technically mine, even if money hasn&#8217;t changed hands yet.</p>
<p>So, yay!  I have a new computer set to arrive within the next few days!  I get bucketloads of memory, stacks of hard disk space, and the joys of Leopard.  My next challenge will be selling my cute Mac Mini, and preferably getting rid of the dead G3 under my desk too.  Any takers?  I&#8217;m guessing there will be more people interested in a working computer than a dead one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/back-to-a-tower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Considering a move to the fast lane</title>
		<link>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iMac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve finally got to the point where I&#8217;m considering upgrading my computer again.  Some of you may remember that it&#8217;s actually not that long ago that I bought my current computer, a second-hand Mac Mini, to replace the previous G3 tower that died.  In all honesty the Mac Mini was only intended to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve finally got to the point where I&#8217;m considering upgrading my computer again.  Some of you may remember that it&#8217;s actually not that long ago that <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/2007/11/80000-miles-and-a-new-computer/">I bought my current computer</a>, a second-hand Mac Mini, to replace the previous <a href="http://www.minipix.co.uk/wordpress/2007/11/time-for-a-much-needed-upgrade/">G3 tower that died</a>.  In all honesty the Mac Mini was only intended to be a short-term solution, as I need to replace the G3 but didn&#8217;t really have a budget for it at the time, hence the need for a cheap stop-gap solution.</p>
<p>To be fair, the Mac Mini has been superb.  It looks great, does the job very nicely, is blissfully quiet, and has a faster processor than the G3.  And for a £260 Mac, it really was a bargain.  Unfortunately, however, its power just doesn&#8217;t match up to my needs, and I&#8217;ve reached the point where I have to seriously consider budgeting for a more powerful alternative.</p>
<p><span id="more-484"></span>In truth, I am not the sort of user Apple targeted the Mac Mini at.  I use my computer for significantly more than surfing the web and checking e-mails.  On an average working day I will normally end up with at least a dozen programs all open at once, some of them big hefty ones like Photoshop; and my nice big 19&#8243; monitor still isn&#8217;t big enough, and I make regular use of virtual desktops, switching between various screens for different types of work.  All this is sometimes reasonably processor-intensive, and definitely requires plenty of RAM.  And it&#8217;s on this count that my Mac Mini falls down.</p>
<p>The 1.42Ghz G4 processor isn&#8217;t exactly sluggish, and handles everything I throw at it.  It&#8217;s the memory that lets it down.  The 512MB of RAM is quickly used up, and beyond that it seems to spend all its time swapping memory in and out from the hard disk, which slows everything down considerably and doesn&#8217;t do the hard disk much good either.  I did consider upgrading the memory in the Mac Mini, but it only has one slot and has an upper limit of 1GB, which I don&#8217;t think will be enough for very long.</p>
<p>So, the upshot of all this is that I&#8217;m looking at buying a new computer.  By &#8216;new&#8217;, incidentally, I mean second-hand, but not old.  After reading an <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/133150/2008/05/macbuying.html">interesting article on buying a Mac</a> the other day I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll need a nuclear-powered fire-breathing <a href="http://www.apple.com/macpro/">Mac Pro</a>, that&#8217;s perhaps a little too much power and far too many pennies.  And a laptop just isn&#8217;t enough of a step up from my Mac Mini to be worth the expense, along with the fact that I would never need it to move from the desk.  It seems the <a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/">iMac</a> is therefore the best option for me at the moment, with its reasonable price and mid-range performance.  It also has a built-in screen, which means I can use my existing TFT monitor as an additional screen for some double-headed fun.  I&#8217;ve found some machines on eBay with 4GB RAM and 2GHz processors, and that should certainly do me for a while.</p>
<p>The only problem with this approach is that it&#8217;s harder to replace bits when they go wrong.  Then again, when do Macs go wrong?  My old G3 only died because it was old, and by old I mean <em>really</em> old, and by <em>really old</em> I mean it originally had a 450MHz processor.  Ouch.</p>
<p>So, a new iMac is on the cards for the near future.  The biggest complication in all of this is that we&#8217;re also trying to save every penny at the moment for a deposit for a house, so that needs to be factored in as well.  Before I buy myself a shiny new computer, I shall need to make sure I can guarantee I can sell my Mac Mini to a good home and get some return on it.  Anyone interested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minipix.co.uk/2008/05/considering-a-move-to-the-fast-lane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
